DrayTek UK Users' Community Forum
Help, Advice and Solutions from DrayTek Users
Port 1723 Open?? Security Risk?
- allawishous
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Junior Member
Less
More
- Posts: 18
- Thank yous received: 0
17 May 2017 14:09 #88942
by allawishous
Port 1723 Open?? Security Risk? was created by allawishous
Having setup a new Vigor 2860Ln with a ADSL & 4G over an outgoing VPN (LAN to LAN), I seem to have an issue where port 1723 is always open on the ADSL connection?
Can anyone advise why this is? Its nothing I have setup in the open ports or route policy.
It is only open on the ADSL connection and not on the 4G or VPN.
1723 is the PPTP VPN port?
I am using shields up to test this port. All others are showing stealth, but not 1723.
If I turn off "Enable PPTP VPN Service" in "VPN and Remote Access >> Remote Access Control Setup" then it shows as stealth, but this also disables the use of my outgoing LAN to LAN VPN connection on the LTE/4G WAN.
Any help is appreciated.
Can anyone advise why this is? Its nothing I have setup in the open ports or route policy.
It is only open on the ADSL connection and not on the 4G or VPN.
1723 is the PPTP VPN port?
I am using shields up to test this port. All others are showing stealth, but not 1723.
If I turn off "Enable PPTP VPN Service" in "VPN and Remote Access >> Remote Access Control Setup" then it shows as stealth, but this also disables the use of my outgoing LAN to LAN VPN connection on the LTE/4G WAN.
Any help is appreciated.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- hornbyp
- Offline
- Big Contributor
Less
More
- Posts: 1323
- Thank yous received: 0
17 May 2017 16:32 #88945
by hornbyp
Replied by hornbyp on topic Re: Port 1723 Open?? Security Risk?
Isn't the bigger risk, using PPTP at all?
I know it's dead easy to setup, but it was compromised long ago. See here (for example):
https://www.comparitech.com/blog/vpn-privacy/the-pptp-vpn-protocol-is-not-secure-use-these-alternatives-instead/
It's more of a "VN" than a "VPN", these days - the "Private" bit no longer applies.
I know it's dead easy to setup, but it was compromised long ago. See here (for example):
It's more of a "VN" than a "VPN", these days - the "Private" bit no longer applies.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- allawishous
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Junior Member
Less
More
- Posts: 18
- Thank yous received: 0
17 May 2017 17:00 #88946
by allawishous
You are right, but not in my scenario. I am only using PPTP VPN on the LTE/4G to have a static IP allocated. Unfortunately most LTE/4G connections are behind CGNAT so you can not accept incoming connections. Using VPN LAN to LAN is a workaround for this.
Replied by allawishous on topic Re: Port 1723 Open?? Security Risk?
Isn't the bigger risk, using PPTP at all?hornbyp wrote:
I know it's dead easy to setup, but it was compromised long ago. See here (for example):https://www.comparitech.com/blog/vpn-privacy/the-pptp-vpn-protocol-is-not-secure-use-these-alternatives-instead/
It's more of a "VN" than a "VPN", these days - the "Private" bit no longer applies.
You are right, but not in my scenario. I am only using PPTP VPN on the LTE/4G to have a static IP allocated. Unfortunately most LTE/4G connections are behind CGNAT so you can not accept incoming connections. Using VPN LAN to LAN is a workaround for this.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- hornbyp
- Offline
- Big Contributor
Less
More
- Posts: 1323
- Thank yous received: 0
17 May 2017 17:49 #88947
by hornbyp
Interesting - you live and learn
I think the fact that Port 1723 responds on WAN1 is expected and in-keeping with "PPTP" being enabled.
Maybe the fact that it's not accessible on the "4G" connection is a consequence of the NAT. After all, if you can't accept incoming connections, then you can't accept 1723... presumably the site-to-site VPN is outbound ?
Replied by hornbyp on topic Re: Port 1723 Open?? Security Risk?
Unfortunately most LTE/4G connections are behind CGNAT so you can not accept incoming connections. Using VPN LAN to LAN is a workaround for this.Allawishous wrote:
Interesting - you live and learn
I think
Maybe the fact that it's not accessible on the "4G" connection is a consequence of the NAT. After all, if you can't accept incoming connections, then you can't accept 1723... presumably the site-to-site VPN is outbound
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Moderators: Chris
Copyright © 2025 DrayTek